Structured Abstract

Multiple Sclerosis Structured Abstract - MS #3

Inpatient treatment to improve functional status

CITATION: Francabandera, F. L., Holland, N. J., Wiesel-Levison, P., & Scheinberg, L. C. (1988). Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: Inpatient vs. outpatient. Rehabilitation Nursing, 13(5), 251-253.


LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IA2a

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE/QUESTION
"The goals of the study were (a) to compare the effects of inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation upon functional status, need for home assistance, and subsequent use of inpatient care, and (b) to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two approaches as reflected in home assistance needs and cost of subsequent acute care hospitalization" (p. 251).

DESIGN

x

RCT

 

Single Case

 

Case Control

 

Cohort

 

Before-After

 

Cross Sectional

Clients were stratified and randomly assigned to either inpatient or outpatient therapy treatment. They were reassessed at 3-month intervals for 2 years.

SAMPLING PROCEDURE
Patients at a MS hospital who agreed to participate and met inclusion criteria.

SAMPLE

N = 73

Mean age = NR

Male = NR

Female = NR

NR = Not reported

Recruited were clients with a definite diagnosis of MS who: had a severe disability as measured by Kurtzke's expanded disability status score (EDSS) range 6-9; at least three specific rehabilitation goals; were not institutionalized and able to return home after treatment; and insurance to cover either inpatient or outpatient treatment.

OUTCOMES

x

Life roles

x

Tasks

x

Activities

 

Abilities/habits

 

Capacities

OUTCOME AREAS

Outcome Area

Measures

Reliability

Validity

Functional Status (ambulatory status and level of independence in self-care)

Incapacity Status Scale (ISS)

Cronbach's alpha = .93, intraclass correlation coefficient = .94

Factor analysis and correlation with home care need

Need for home assistance (# of hours of assistance for ADL both paid and unpaid)

Structured interview

NR

NR

NR=Not Reported

INTERVENTION 
Description
Inpatient - usually two 45-minute PT sessions and one 45-minute OT session per day. Bladder management, speech therapy, social services as needed; equipment needs.

Outpatient - Amount of time for OT/PT not mentioned. Home training by nurse. All others as above.

Who delivered
Appropriate therapist

Setting
Inpatient - Clinic

Outpatient - Clinic and home

Frequency
Did not specify

Duration
Did not specify

RESULTS
Initial ISS scores significantly different. ANCOVA to control for this.

  • Significant difference between ISS scores (F(1,70) = 4.3, p < .05) at 3 month follow-up.
  • No significant difference (F(1,70) = .17) between inpatient and outpatient for home assistance.
  • Have not completed other follow-ups in this article.

CONCLUSIONS
Biases - masking, recall, dropouts

  • Therapists not blinded to groups assignment
  • ISS was a self-report measure for some clients at follow-up.
  • 11 clients lost to follow-up. No measurement of their differences reported.

COMMENTARY
Occupational therapy as part of an inpatient treatment is marginally better than OT as part of an outpatient treatment. Both are about equal in cost-effectiveness.


Terminology used in this document is based on two systems of classification current at the time the evidence-based literature reviews were completed: Uniform Terminology for Occupational Therapy Practice-Third Edition (AOTA, 1994) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICIDH-2) (World Health Organization [WHO], 1999). More recently, the Uniform Terminology document was replaced by Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (AOTA, 2002), and modifications to ICIDH-2 were finalized in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO, 2001).

This work is based on the evidence-based literature review completed by Nancy Baker, ScD, OTR, and Linda Tickle-Degnen, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA.

For more information about the Evidence-Based Literature Review Project, contact the Practice Department at the American Occupational Therapy Association, 301-652-6611, x 2040.


Copyright 2003 American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may be reproduced and distributed without prior written consent.



Last Updated: 5/17/2007
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: